Updated: May 15, 2020
Contribution signée David De Coninck (KU Leuven), Leen d’Haenens (KU Leuven) et Koen Matthijs (KU Leuven).
Recently, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been rapidly expanding across the globe. In order to respond to this pandemic, many countries are combining suppression and mitigation activities aimed at delaying major surges of patients and leveling the demand for hospital beds, while protecting the most vulnerable from infection. Bedford et al. state that ‘national response strategies include varying levels of contact tracing and self-isolation or quarantine; promotion of public health measures, including hand washing, respiratory etiquette, and social distancing; and closing all non-essential establishments’ (1). It is crucial for the public’s health that information about these measures is accurately and quickly disseminated throughout the population. Currently, legacy news media (e.g. television, radio, newspapers) and social media are the main platforms through which this dissemination takes place (2) (3). However, there are several aspects related to the journalistic infrastructure on the one hand and on the reliance on news media as agents of information on the other that may (in)directly and inadvertently endanger the public’s health in several ways.
Social issues related to the Belgian 'lockdown' measures
Although the corona crisis is the biggest journalistic story in times, that same crisis is also directly crippling media companies. This is a paradoxical situation: news consumption, viewing and reading figures, visits and likes are sky-high (9), but contrary to what happens in ‘normal’ times, media turnover is dropping. As non-essential establishments are closed and (mass )events are cancelled, the demand for ads has dropped. Consequently, many news outlets are suffering from falling advertisement revenues. This loss may cause structural damage to many traditional news media and may signal a rapid shift to a more digitized media environment. The need for local information provision and local connections is greater than ever, but the revenue model for local and regional news provision has completely collapsed as it is heavily dependent on advertising revenues from local small and medium-sized enterprises.
The public’s reliance on news media coverage to convey accurate information increases during times of uncertainty and crisis–especially in the current context with large shares of the population working or locked down in their homes (4). This leads to increased anxiety or stress, which in turn has a detrimental impact on the public’s physical and mental health over time, as evidenced by longitudinal studies following other health or societal crises (4) (5). Not only the amount, but also the content of news media coverage is related to public anxieties: overly sensationalized coverage (e.g., graphic imagery) is related to higher stress levels (6). However, not all media types frame stories the same way, are equally trusted or have an equal impact on fears among the public (7) (8). Given the large presence of fake news and the growing distrust of the public in social media, legacy media remain important platforms for informing the public. The damage that legacy media are currently sustaining endangers journalists, particularly the self-employed journalists and the freelancers, in their ability to accurately report the news.
The government must take these problems into account and take measures. We urge the Flemish and the French Community governments to follow the example of the Netherlands, where a subsidy of €11 million has been made available to support local information provision. Readers are also invited to donate or to subscribe. Governmental supports are imperative to sustain and uphold the journalistic infrastructure, maintain integrity and quality in news media, given their importance in the dissemination of information to the public.
Policy makers face several challenges as they look ahead to loosening some of the restrictive public health measures that have been installed over the past weeks. As some European countries are cautiously looking ahead to what lies beyond the crisis and begin to make plans to lift some of the restrictions, legacy media will play an essential role in this. Preliminary COVID-19 research on representative samples of the Flemish public teaches us that news media consumption–particularly on (public) television–is strongly related to support for public health measures. A clear communication strategy by the governments will therefore be vital in ensuring that the public is well-informed about when and how restrictions are lifted in order to avoid a second wave of COVID-19 (10). Minimizing sensationalized coverage, while at the same time actively engaging in debunking fake news, will be necessary to limit public anxiety and stress, and facilitate a ‘normalization’ of societal life.
(1) Bedford J, Enria D, Giesecke J, Heymann DL, Ihekweazu C, Kobinger G, et al. COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. Lancet. 2020. Available from: doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30673-5.
(2) Merchant RM, Lurie N. Social media and emergency preparedness in response to novel coronavirus. JAMA. 2020. Available from: doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4469.
(3) Garfin DR, Silver RC, Holman EA. The novel Coronavirus (COVID-2019) outbreak: Amplification of public health consequences by media exposure. Health Psychology. 2020. Available from: doi: 10.1037/ hea0000875.
(4) Ball-Rokeach SJ, DeFleur ML. A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research. 1976; 3: 3-21. Available from: doi: 10.1177/009365027600300101.
(5) Thompson RR, Garfin DR, Holman EA, Silver RC. Distress, worry, and functioning following a global health crisis: A national study of Americans’ responses to Ebola. Clinical Psychological Science. 2017; 5; 513-21. Available from: doi: 10.1177/2167702617692030.
(6) Holman EA, Garfin DR, Lubens P, Silver RC. Media exposure to collective trauma, mental health, and functioning: Does it matter what you see? Clinical Psychological Science. 2020; 8: 111–24. Available from: doi: 10.1177/2167702619858300.
(7) Randolph W, Viswanath K. Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: Marketing health in a crowded media world. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004; 25: 419-37. Available from: doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123046.
(8) De Coninck D, Matthijs, K, Debrael M, Joris W, De Cock R, d’Haenens L. The relationship between media use and public opinion on immigrants and refugees: A Belgian perspective. Communications. 2018; 43: 403-25. Available from: doi: 10.1515/commun-2018-0016.
(9) Opgenhaffen M. Nieuwsconsumptie in tijden van Covid-19: meer bezoekers, meer likes, meer engagement [News consumption in times of Covid-19: more visitors, more likes, more engagement]. Available from: URL: https://email@example.com/nieuwsconsumptie-in-tijden-van-covid-19-meer-bezoekers-meer-likes-meer-engagement-d8a166a20211
(10) Xu S, Li Y. Beware of the second wave of COVID-19. Lancet. 2020. Available from: doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(20)30845-X.